What is a man of letters who is not elevated by his character, by the
merit of his friends and by a little leisure? If he lacks this last advantage
to the point that he can't live decently in the society that his merit calls
him to, what need does he have of society? Isn't he obliged then to choose a
solitude in which he can cultivate his soul, his character and his reason in
peace? Is it necessary for him to carry the weight of society without
collecting any of the advantages that it gives to other types of citizens? A
man of letters who is forced into going alone will find the happiness there
that he has sought elsewhere in vain. It is such a person who can say that by
having been refused everything, he has been given everything. On how many
occasions can't a person repeat the phrase of Themistocles: "Alas! We would have perished if we hadn't
perished!"
